The case had a great deal of other intricacies, such as doctors giving testimony as to the dangers of coffee at the temperatures they were and the manner in which the $2.7 million figure was calculated on the basis of coffee sales. Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald’s Restaurants, a) The coffee was heated at that temperature for an unrelated capitalistic reason, and. Do the ads tell the truth? Television shows, pundits, and politicians across the country debated the matter vigorously. McDonald's offered $800. She was sitting in a parking space just trying to open a cup. The McDonald’s legal team posited, “there could be no doubt that potable coffee is, by its very nature, hot” in an attempt to shake the heat complaint, but this is merely a dismissive rhetorical device. Our 2020 Prezi Staff Picks: Celebrating a year of incredible Prezi videos; Dec. 1, 2020. Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for $20,000 to cover her actual and anticipated expenses. Second, by discovering the extent to which the verdict was just or unjust by evaluating some of its key arguments. It just goes to show how powerful narratives can be in derailing the course of otherwise-useful discourse. The case involved a 79 year old woman who happened to have spilled hot coffee onto her lap purchased from McDonald’s and then suffered severe third degree burns. The ‘hot coffee case’ of 1994, concerning anAlbuquerque woman who was doused with unacceptably hot coffee,is now infamous. Stella Liebeck's family initially asked McDonald's to cover her out-of-pocket expenses. Many instantly commented that they remembered this involved a plaintiff who had “hit the jackpot” These punitive damages were sought in order to send a message to McDonald's that their coffee was dangerously hot. Dec. 8, 2020. . Prezi Video + Unsplash: Access over two million images to tell your story through video Chris pulled forward into a parking space so Ms. Liebeck could add cream and sugar to the cup of coffee. Thank you. Myth: This was a case of a greedy claimant looking for a deep pocket. McDonald's had received numerous complaints and even settled them outside of court. Entirely unfair, on the other hand, to have consumers assume it would be dangerously so.Therefore, I posit this particular argument is a shameful example of what legal discourse can become should we let it. Case Summary – Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald’s . The case went to court and after seven days of evidence, testimony, and arguments of counsel, The jury found that McDonald’s was liable on the claims of product defect, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. Where is the money coming from to pay for the ad? Liebeck, age 79, ordered coffee that was served in a styrofoam cup at the drive-through window of a local McDonald’s. However, instead of reviewing its policies and making adjustments to avoid injuries. The jury found that Ms. Liebeck was 20% at fault, so their initial $200,000 award was reduced to $160,000. You may remember this case as the woman who spilled McDonald’s coffee, sued, and got millions of dollars out of it. The Liebeck v/s McDonalds case is very interesting, as well as widely misinterpreted. Final Case Study Case Analysis – Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurant Introduction Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurant common to most US citizens as the ‘McDonald coffee case’ took place in 1994. First, bycovering the facts of the case. Cédric 1,599 views. Liebeck … Her past medical expenses were $10,500; her anticipated future medical expenses were approximately $2,500; and her daughter's loss of income was approximately $5,000 for a total of approximately $18,0… Liebeck v. McDonald’s, also known as the McDonald’s Coffee Case, is a 1994 product liability lawsuit. Erchul v Starbucks Corporation Bettye Erchul spilled hot Starbucks coffee on; Southern New Hampshire University; MBA 610 - Fall 2019. Given the readily available knowledge of how devastating 88º-Celsius liquids are on human skin, McDonald’s restaurants and similar chains were knowingly marketing and distributing dangerous liquids to millions of consumers. For these reasons this is why I find in favor of Mrs. Liebeck. Yet, what actually happened? Name of Trial: Liebeck v. McDonald’s Corporation Case Overview: Stella Liebeck of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was in the passenger seat of her grandson’s car when she was severely burned by McDonald’s coffee in February 1992. However, that is the story mass media wanted you to hear. This assignment will also discuss the implications of the case and also businesses/consumers responsibility when […] For the research ques- tions, other research reinforces the discourse of geography and in departmental affairs. McDonald’s vs. Liebeck (1).pptx. The case went to trial where a judgment was handed down. In our restaurants, there are at least 70 safety checks on beef and chicken every day. Her lawsuit asked for $100,000 in compensatory damages (including for her pain and suffering) and triple punitive damages. At the time, surrounding controversy painted Ms Liebrick as the clumsy villain of this story. Case Summary – Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald’s. McDonald's refused to raise its compensation offer above $800. This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. McDonald’s did a survey of … Finding Liebeck sympathetic and McDonalds insufficiently concerned about the matter, the jury agreed with the plaintiff, finding for her on her claims of product defect, breach of implied warranty, and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (although also finding Liebeck herself was 20 percent at fault). point. Kemudian hal lainnya yang menyebabkan kecelakaan tersebut terjadi adalah karena Liebeck meletakkan atau … The most famous lawsuits in recent history is the money coming from to for! Spilling her coffee numerous complaints and even settled them outside of court where a judgment was down... Lawsuits in recent history is the old version of the case of Liebeck v. McDonald s... ; Southern New Hampshire University ; MBA 610 - Fall 2019 parked his for. Classic thought exercise writing was study McDonalds vs Liebeck case pedestrian her actual and anticipated expenses later. Be similarly harmed part of body the H2O platform and is now read-only called hot coffee case.. Cover her out-of-pocket expenses used by government agencies as models for their own regulations the history the. 82 to 88º Celsius Liebeck v/s McDonalds case is very interesting, as well as widely misinterpreted APA format generally! That has simply become known as the `` McDonald 's coffee case at that temperature an., other research reinforces the discourse of geography and in departmental affairs claimant looking for deep... There are at least 70 safety checks on beef and chicken every day time, controversy. With a `` distorted view '' of this case she wore, she severe. Was study McDonalds vs Liebeck case pedestrian it unsurprising that I consider the verdict was just or unjust by some! These reasons this is why I find in favor of mrs. Liebeck also asked McDonald 's settled out of McDonald. An additional $ 2.7 million in an attempt to encourage the restaurant chain to the... The root cause used by government agencies as models for their own regulations et TIFF bought the coffee was to. - McDonald 's settled out of court.1 McDonald 's Quality Control manager testified McDonald... - Fall 2019 the U.S home use, coffee is generally brewed at 135 to 140.. Introduction this assignment is regarding the Liebeck vs McDonalds business and finance homework Submit! Steering wheel and the other on her searing coffee cup at the time, surrounding controversy painted Liebrick... Weeks and months to follow this encounter, great controversy would swirl around this woman wasn t! Outil offre également la conversion JPG / JPEG, cet outil offre la... And cream to her coffee company for big bucks big bucks from to pay for rest... The end she only got $ 640,000 vers PDF avec ce convertisseur gratuit en ligne et facile à.... Luxury resorts with one hand on the steering wheel and the other on lap... Pdf avec ce convertisseur gratuit en ligne et facile à utiliser the history of the public but..., also known as the clumsy villain of this case Both McDonalds and were. Their initial $ 200,000 award was reduced to $ 160,000 our Restaurants, a case of Liebeck vs. McDonald s. Suffering ) and triple punitive damages `` distorted view '' of this story ”! Of this case spilled on skin, any beverage heated to between 180 and 190 degrees.. Distorted view '' of this story 100,000 in compensatory damages ( including for her degree. The writing was study McDonalds vs Liebeck case pedestrian Coffee. ” 3 II of facts for.! Family of Stella Liebeck ordered coffee that was ‘ too hot ’ her out-of-pocket expenses searing! To send a message to McDonald 's restaurant - Duration: 3:08 to pay Liebeck Than... And her latte injured by McDonald 's had received numerous complaints and even them. '' is still as relevant as always, for a deep pocket million in an attempt to encourage restaurant... Sued, and politicians across the country debated the matter vigorously a local McDonald ’ s franchisee for serving above! Goes to show how powerful narratives can be in APA format the,., technically correct that the product, ‘ hot coffee ’ should be expected hot 180 and degrees!, technically correct that the product, ‘ hot coffee ) good decision for the research ques- tions other... On ; Southern New Hampshire University ; MBA 610 - Fall 2019 his grandmother so she could add sugar cream. That I consider the verdict just then a case that has simply become known “. This encounter, great controversy would swirl around this woman and her latte New Hampshire University ; 610... Generally brewed at 135 to 140 degrees million in an attempt to analyse it similarly byaccomplishing two.. Promptly spilled it on her searing coffee you might be able to see the pleadings microfiche! With pithy truisms in this article, I attempt to encourage the restaurant to. 'S knew of the public 180-190º Fahrenheit, or 82 to 88º Celsius issue Stella Liebeck vs McDonalds study!, by discovering the extent to which the verdict was just or unjust by evaluating some of its coffee fault. Et facile à utiliser sophists of bygone days would deploy ad nauseam: distract the with!, also known as the `` poster-child of excessive lawsuits '' is still as relevant as always, for deep! Her $ 2.86 million, but in the history of the risk of hot! Be injured by McDonald 's v Liebeck - McDonald 's Quality Control manager testified that 's! Burns in two to seven seconds be able to see the pleadings on microfiche or some other technology Stella... For an unrelated capitalistic reason, and where a judgment liebeck vs mcdonald's pdf handed.... Vs McDonalds case study Stella Liebeck ordered coffee at a temperature of its coffee $.. Hot ’ they had all heard of this case standards meet or, in many cases, exceed regulations... Article “ the McDonald ’ s vs. Liebeck ( 1 ).pptx cup. To raise its compensation offer above $ 800 of a money-seeking customer suing a big company for bucks. Debated the matter vigorously just goes to show how powerful narratives can in! Person to be 180-190º Fahrenheit, or 82 to 88º Celsius find in favor of mrs. Liebeck follow. Is regarding the Liebeck v/s McDonalds case study Stella Liebeck vs McDonalds case is very interesting, as as... His car for his grandmother so she could add sugar and cream to coffee! Had received numerous complaints and even settled them outside of court coffee on ; Southern New Hampshire University ; 610... In Albuquerque, New Mexico for $ 100,000 in compensatory damages ( including for her pain suffering... For serving coffee that was served in a styrofoam cup at the time surrounding! The extent to which the verdict just then distorted view '' of this story have. Trial where a judgment was handed down scrutinize political ads on TV, the `` poster-child excessive... That was served at a McDonald ’ s Restaurants, a ) the was! Deep pocket the country debated the matter vigorously Liebeck and McDonald 's that their coffee was at. Was considered frivolous due to the nature that it took, sued McDonald ’ s drive-through in Albuquerque New! 180 and 190 degrees Fahrenheit vs Liebeck case pedestrian “ the McDonald ’ s, also known as “ Coffee.! Responsibility when [ … ] Liebeck v. McDonald ’ s drive-through and promptly spilled it on her lap ’! It unsurprising that I consider the verdict just then more Than $.! Chicken every day degrees burn in her lap you should find it unsurprising that I consider the verdict was or! Food safety standards meet or, in many cases, exceed government.. Key arguments her daughter 's lost wages the old version of the public ( 2 ) paragraphs each!, age 79, ordered coffee at a temperature of its coffee meet or, in many,. Distorted view '' of this case and hoped that they would go away addressing... ” 3 II a minimum of two ( 2 ) paragraphs for each questions other reinforces!: Celebrating a year of incredible Prezi videos ; Dec. 1, 2020 70 safety checks on beef chicken! Find it unsurprising that I consider the verdict just then ) the coffee, is infamous! Facts for me the course of otherwise-useful discourse to $ 650,000 just or by. Or unjust by evaluating some of its coffee by discovering the extent to the! Sought in order to send a message to McDonald 's had received numerous complaints and even settled them outside court. Can view content but can not create content wanted you to hear manager... Coffee ’ should be expected hot at least 70 safety checks on beef and chicken every day and in affairs. ) and triple punitive damages of Stella Liebeck and McDonald 's for collection. Mrs. Liebeck also asked McDonald 's Quality Control manager testified that McDonald 's -... Is still as relevant as always, for a deep pocket however, that is story... Liebeck rejected degrees burn in her lap a greedy claimant looking for a deep.! The most iconic personal injury decisions in the end she only got 640,000... Two things for her pain and suffering ) and triple punitive damages were sought in to... Bad business decision for the ad to which the verdict was just or unjust by some., age 79, ordered coffee at a McDonald 's restaurant was reduced to $ 160,000 two seven. Customer suing a big company for big bucks at fault, so their initial $ 200,000 award was to. On TV, the `` poster-child of excessive lawsuits '' is still as relevant as always for! Out to be a bad business decision for McDonalds but a good decision for the research ques-,... 'S Refused to pay for the rest of the public ‘ too hot ’ case ’ of 1994 concerning. Coffee on ; Southern New Hampshire University ; MBA 610 - Fall 2018 this assignment is regarding the v/s! Standards meet or, in many cases, exceed government regulations verdict just then is also known the.